Welcome to Our Blog Conversations Beyond the Classroom!
Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversation Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study? As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! I encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…). Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!
Monday, May 2, 2011
Dustin's "What Would Socrates Say" Interpretation
In our section, the author describes his views that should be taken towards being 21st century minded. Also he states the key elements that should be approached in this process. In his article, “What Would Socrates Say?” the author Peter W. Cookson Jr. states, “The 21st century mind will need to successfully manage the complexity and diversity of our world by becoming more fluid, more flexible, more focused on reality, and radically more innovative” (Pg. 2). What the Cookson is saying here is that society needs to adapt to the changing times in the world, technologically. Cookson goes on to state three key ideas that he believes are crucial to become 21st minded. “Critical Reflection” (Pg. 2) is basically having an open mind and seeing different problems and solutions through others eyes and not just your own. “Empirical Thinking” (Pg. 2) is a responsibility that each one of us should have to solve the world’s problems collaboratively, instead of expecting a supernatural event to help us through situations. People need to step forward, assess the situations and together fix the problems at hand. Coming together and sharing generations of different intelligence is viewed as crucial by the author when he adds his last claim of “Collective Intelligence” (Pg3.) Cookson’s three points tie into his main idea in my section by stating that, “We will need an education system that doesn’t focus on memorization, but rather on promoting those metacognitive skills that enable us to monitor our own learning and make changes in our approach if we perceive that our learning is not going well” (Pg.3). Metacognition is the thinking about our own thought process. Cookson feels strongly that Metacognition skills are important to assess our own learning and to make changes to it if something isn’t working.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In your article I found the way you explained "Empirical Thinking", and "Collective Intelligence" easy to understand. The way you wrote the two, made it flow quite freely together. Understanding how the two go hand in hand.
ReplyDelete